Atlas21
  • ‎
No Result
View All Result
Atlas21
No Result
View All Result
Atlas21
Home Bitcoin

The dark side of Telegram founder’s arrest

Federico Rivi by Federico Rivi
September 10, 2024
in Bitcoin, Feature, Opinion
The dark side of Telegram founder’s arrest
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linkedin

Durov claims to abide by laws, including the Digital Services Act, but his arrest brings up a deeper issue: who establishes restraint at home?

As we are all aware by now, Pavel Durov, the Russian-born billionaire and founder of the Telegram messaging app, was arrested at Le Bourget airport outside Paris after arriving on a private jet from Azerbaijan. Durov was taken into custody late Saturday by the French National Anti-Fraud Office. The charges are reportedly related to alleged illegal activities by Telegram users, which the platform is accused of failing to moderate. An investigating magistrate has extended Durov’s detention while the case is examined, with a potential detention period of up to 96 hours. At the conclusion of this period, the judge will decide on further actions.

Telegram’s response and legal context

In response to the arrest, Telegram issued a statement asserting that Durov has “nothing to hide” and highlighted that the platform complies with EU regulations, including the Digital Services Act. The company emphasized that its moderation policies meet industry standards and are continuously improving.

⚖️ Telegram abides by EU laws, including the Digital Services Act — its moderation is within industry standards and constantly improving.

✈️ Telegram's CEO Pavel Durov has nothing to hide and travels frequently in Europe.

😵‍💫 It is absurd to claim that a platform or its owner…

— Telegram Messenger (@telegram) August 25, 2024

The ethical debate: who is the ultimate decision maker?

Beyond the mere reporting of events, the Durov case has obviously reignited the ongoing debate on freedom of speech and the power of authorities over social platforms. The politicization of the case makes little sense—Durov has refused to collaborate with Russia in the past, not just with Western countries—so there are two key points to analyze:

  • What should Telegram do for its customers?
  • Who should decide the moderation policies?

Telegram markets and advertises itself as a privacy-focused messaging service – though it’s important to acknowledge that there are other services that offer even more robust privacy protections. Despite this, Telegram’s positioning as a privacy-centric platform is a strategic choice that resonates with a large user base seeking a balance between usability and security. Given this brand identity, it makes perfect sense that Telegram would be resistant to collaborating with authorities on matters that could compromise user data. Such cooperation could undermine the very value proposition that has attracted millions of users to the platform.

If Telegram were to capitulate to demands for data sharing or content moderation in ways that violate user privacy, it would risk eroding the trust that underpins its entire business model. Users who prioritize privacy might abandon the platform in favor of alternatives that offer stronger guarantees of confidentiality and security. Therefore, Telegram’s stance on non-cooperation with authorities is not merely a matter of principle but a strategic decision to protect its core offering.

Self-moderation is the only way

A crucial aspect of the debate on moderation concerns the capacity and legitimacy of digital platforms to control content. When a company like Telegram introduces the possibility of moderating content, several fundamental questions arise. First, in order to decide which content should be moderated, it is necessary to read all of it. This immediately raises privacy concerns: who guarantees that users’ private messages are not intercepted? If someone can read messages, privacy is already compromised.

Secondly, who decides what is legitimate? The notion of legitimacy is fluid and varies from country to country, from government to government, and even within the same societies over time. What the European Union might consider acceptable today could be deemed illegitimate tomorrow, or vice versa. The same question applies to other global actors: which standard should prevail? Well, the answer is: those of the owner.

The only way to find common ground in this global context is not to rely on existing laws, which are often contradictory, but rather on the principle of private property. Telegram itself should be the sole authority to decide what and how to moderate on its own platform. It will then be the market that judges its actions: users, through their choices, will determine whether Telegram’s moderation policies are fair or not. If users believe Telegram manages moderation fairly and respectfully, they will continue using the service; otherwise, they will migrate to other platforms that better meet their needs for freedom and privacy.

Previous Post

Cryptocurrencies and politics: crypto contributions influence U.S. federal elections

Next Post

UAE monitors arrest of Telegram Ceo amid expansive investigation

Latest News

bitcoin
Bitcoin

Cantor Fitzgerald launches Bitcoin fund with gold hedge

by Newsroom
May 30, 2025
0

A new investment vehicle combines exposure to Bitcoin with downside protection based on the price of gold.

Read moreDetails
bitmain
Bitcoin

Bitmain unveils the Antminer S23 Hydro: unprecedented efficiency

by Newsroom
May 31, 2025
0

Bitmain’s new device raises the bar for energy efficiency.

Read moreDetails
lightning network
Bitcoin

Amboss launches Rails: a service to earn yields from the Lightning Network

by Newsroom
May 30, 2025
0

The company unveils a service to generate returns from the Lightning Network while maintaining full control over one’s bitcoin.

Read moreDetails
Arkham rivela l’87% degli indirizzi Bitcoin di Strategy
Bitcoin

Arkham reveals 87% of Strategy’s Bitcoin addresses

by Newsroom
May 30, 2025
0

The blockchain analytics firm claims to have identified the Bitcoin addresses held by the company led by Saylor.

Read moreDetails
blockstream
Bitcoin

Blockstream launches a non-custodial app to buy Bitcoin

by Newsroom
May 30, 2025
0

At Bitcoin 2025, the company unveils the Blockstream App and a strategic roadmap to accelerate adoption.

Read moreDetails
Atlas21

© 2025 Atlas21

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Home
  • Feature
  • Bitcoin
  • Careers
  • Opinion
  • Interviews
  • Privacy Policy
  • News
  • Learn
  • B2B
  • Press
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Interviews
  • Learn
  • Feature
  • Services
  • Adoption
  • ‎
    • ‎

© 2025 Atlas21

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site, we will assume that you are happy with it.AcceptCookie